On fre, 2010-07-30 at 01:23 +0900, Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> I'm thinking about taking a few weeks after August or September
> to review and merge the document intensively (like CommitFest)
> by some developers who are interested in this doc.
> I know this change is very huge, and it's very difficult to review
> and give feedback through the whole document. So I think we sould take
> an approach to review and merge chapter by chapter during the period,
> and it can be an effective way to merge this large change
> if we can take time for such intensive work.
> Is this possible? Any suggestions?
If you want this reviewed, please send in a patch of the source code you
In response to
pgsql-docs by date
|Next:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2010-09-26 17:07:32|
|Subject: Re: Additional index entries and table sorting|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-09-26 11:57:50|
|Subject: Re: ECPG - Some errno definitions don't match to the manual|
pgsql-interfaces by date
|Next:||From: Satoshi Nagayasu||Date: 2010-09-28 10:01:52|
|Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] ECPG Documentation Improvement (re-post)|
|Previous:||From: Bosco Rama||Date: 2010-08-26 17:28:06|
|Subject: Re: Large object support in ecpg|