Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-29 22:44:47
Message-ID: 12849.1264805087@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Well, since I asked in April of 2009, at the beginning of the cycle, 6
> years after the introduction of the variable, and we still are not doing
> it, then let's stop pretending we will ever do it.

We have made forward progress since that thread (we fixed the plpgsql
parsing issues, partially in 8.4 and completely for 9.0).  We can
continue to make forward progress in the future.  But *right now is not
the time*.  We have more than enough on our plates for 9.0 already, and
just about nobody believes we are going to meet the schedule now.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-01-29 22:46:35
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-29 22:34:09
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group