Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding
Date: 2010-09-07 18:54:47
Message-ID: 1283885687.2517.11.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On sön, 2010-08-22 at 15:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We combine the surrogate pair components to a single code point and
> > encode that in UTF-8.  We don't encode the components separately;
> that
> > would be wrong.
> 
> Oh, OK.  Should the docs make that a bit clearer?

Done.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jeff DavisDate: 2010-09-07 19:41:51
Subject: Re: "Freezing" per-role settings
Previous:From: Sergey KonoplevDate: 2010-09-07 18:39:33
Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group