On sön, 2010-08-22 at 15:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > We combine the surrogate pair components to a single code point and
> > encode that in UTF-8.  We don't encode the components separately;
> that
> > would be wrong.
> 
> Oh, OK.  Should the docs make that a bit clearer?

Done.

In response to

• Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding at 2010-08-22 19:15:04 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: UTF16 surrogate pairs in UTF8 encoding at 2010-09-08 07:18:36 from Marko Kreen

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Jeff Davis	Date: 2010-09-07 19:41:51
	Subject: Re: "Freezing" per-role settings
Previous:	From: Sergey Konoplev	Date: 2010-09-07 18:39:33
	Subject: Re: function_name.parameter_name