Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, pgsql-docs(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUGS] issue about information_schema REFERENTIAL_CONSTRAINTS
Date: 2010-09-07 14:49:06
Message-ID: 1283870946.2517.9.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugspgsql-docs
On sön, 2010-09-05 at 22:16 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > A very similar issue is already documented here:
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/infoschema-triggers.html
> 
> That sort of annotation was my first thought, but we'd have to repeat
> ourselves in multiple places because there are several views that are
> affected by the constraint-name issue.  (Come to think of it, isn't
> triggered_update_columns also affected by the trigger-name issue?)
> 
> Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
> the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?

It would probably be better to explain globally applicable issues in a
separate section.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-09-07 17:12:11
Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-07 14:44:08
Subject: Re: Missing utils/fmgroids.h file

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-09-07 15:56:32
Subject: Re: BUG #5646: missing chunk number 0 for toast
Previous:From: missing chunk numberDate: 2010-09-07 09:47:17
Subject: BUG #5646: missing chunk number 0 for toast

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group