On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 19:24 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> > That requirement falls out from the handling of disconnected standbys. If a
> > standby is not connected, what does the master do with commits? If the
> > answer is anything else than acknowledge them to the client immediately, as
> > if the standby never existed, the master needs to know what standby servers
> > exist. Otherwise it can't know if all the standbys are connected or not.
> Thanks. I understood why the registration is required.
I don't. There is a simpler design that does not require registration.
Please explain why we need registration, with an explanation that does
not presume it as a requirement.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Haggerty||Date: 2010-09-02 12:13:28|
|Subject: Re: git: uh-oh|
|Previous:||From: Itagaki Takahiro||Date: 2010-09-02 11:10:33|
|Subject: Re: register/unregister standby Re: Synchronous replication|