| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, dev(at)archonet(dot)com |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
| Date: | 2010-09-01 20:34:32 |
| Message-ID: | 1283373196-sup-8678@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-www |
Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of mié sep 01 16:22:22 -0400 2010:
> I'm coming round to the idea that if we wanted such a table of
> contents, we'd generate it on the page when building the docs rather
> than running some ECMAScript. I've already got a basic contents thing
> showing on my version of the docs (see
> http://pgweb.darkixion.com:8081/docs/9.0/static/functions-xml.html ),
> but I'm not happy with it. It looks out of place and there doesn't
> seem to be any appropriate place to put the link to show it.
How does this effort relate to
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B7EA23A.1000705@archonet.com ?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-09-01 20:39:54 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-01 20:34:09 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-09-01 20:39:54 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-09-01 20:34:09 | Re: [pgsql-www] Example indenting |