Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: General migration question

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "[ADMIN]" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: General migration question
Date: 2010-08-31 15:57:50
Message-ID: 1283270270.2867.14.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:42 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:

> > All I'm suggesting is lumping those things requiring a dump/restore
> > together for major updates.
> 
> That's exactly what does happen, if you remember that pgsql is
> numbered major.major.minor.

Perhaps thinking about it like this will help:

(major.major).(minor|maintenance)

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt


In response to

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: A JDate: 2010-08-31 17:42:16
Subject: Confused by 'timing' results
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-08-31 15:44:50
Subject: Re: Tuple changes from relfilenodes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group