| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Spiegelberg <gspiegelberg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "[ADMIN]" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: General migration question |
| Date: | 2010-08-31 15:57:50 |
| Message-ID: | 1283270270.2867.14.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 09:42 -0600, Scott Marlowe wrote:
> > All I'm suggesting is lumping those things requiring a dump/restore
> > together for major updates.
>
> That's exactly what does happen, if you remember that pgsql is
> numbered major.major.minor.
Perhaps thinking about it like this will help:
(major.major).(minor|maintenance)
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 509.416.6579
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
http://twitter.com/cmdpromptinc | http://identi.ca/commandprompt
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | A J | 2010-08-31 17:42:16 | Confused by 'timing' results |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-31 15:44:50 | Re: Tuple changes from relfilenodes |