Re: SGML on functions

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SGML on functions
Date: 2010-08-27 22:31:24
Message-ID: 1282948205-sup-3873@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Excerpts from Thom Brown's message of vie ago 27 14:56:04 -0400 2010:
> Copied from another thread...
>
> Something I've noticed is an inconsistency in the SGML markup around
> functions listed in tables. Sometimes the entire function signature
> is considered to be the function, and other times it's just the
> function name, with its parameters outside of the <function> tags.
>
> E.g.:
>
> <function>variance</function>(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)
>
> vs
>
> <function>stddev_samp(<replaceable
> class="parameter">expression</replaceable>)</function>
>
> Which way is correct?

The latter I think -- see
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/function.html
(but perhaps search the actual standard)

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thom Brown 2010-08-28 18:47:17 Re: Doc fixes and improvements
Previous Message Thom Brown 2010-08-27 20:57:29 Re: SGML on functions