Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

why restrict role "public" but not "Public"?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: why restrict role "public" but not "Public"?
Date: 2010-08-24 22:34:11
Message-ID: 1282689179-sup-8861@alvh.no-ip.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I just noticed that we restrict creation of a role named "public", but
this is case-sensitive -- i.e. we don't restrict roles named PUBLIC,
etc.

Is this intended?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-24 23:04:14
Subject: Re: why restrict role "public" but not "Public"?
Previous:From: Steve SingerDate: 2010-08-24 21:39:57
Subject: HS/SR on AIX

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group