I just noticed that we restrict creation of a role named "public", but
this is case-sensitive -- i.e. we don't restrict roles named PUBLIC,
Is this intended?
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-08-24 23:04:14
Subject: Re: why restrict role "public" but not "Public"?
Previous:From: Steve SingerDate: 2010-08-24 21:39:57
Subject: HS/SR on AIX