Re: [GENERAL] Empty arrays with ARRAY[]

"Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I actually thought that A_ArrayExpr would be a good addition even if
> you ignore the matter of typecasting. It always seemed weird to me
> that the parser generates an ArrayExpr directly. ArrayExpr has a
> bunch of members that are only set by the transform; all the parser
> does is set the 'elements' member.

Well, that's a reasonable argument. And now that I think about it,
a parser-only node type doesn't have nearly the support overhead that
a full-fledged executable node does. So no objection to A_ArrayExpr
if you want to do that.

> I had a bit of a dig into this. A_Const->typename gets set directly
> by the parse paths for "INTERVAL [(int)] string [interval range]". In
> fact, as far as I can tell that's the _only_ place A_Const->typename
> gets used at all.

Uh, you missed quite a lot of others ... see CURRENT_DATE and a lot of
other productions.

regards, tom lane