On tis, 2010-07-27 at 16:33 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> * Do we already have it?
> Not really. There are kludges to accomplish these things, but
> they're available mostly in the sense that a general-purpose
> language allows you to write code to do anything a Turing machine
> can do.
I think this has been obsoleted by the xmlexists patch.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: pgsql-hackers||Date: 2010-08-06 06:15:54|
|Subject: firstname.lastname@example.org 21% OFF on Pfizer!|
|Previous:||From: Pavel Stehule||Date: 2010-08-06 03:57:37|
|Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch|
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Mike Fowler||Date: 2010-08-06 08:04:15|
|Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-08-06 02:29:10|
|Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function|