Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Round Robin Reviewers <pgsql-rrreviewers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Date: 2010-08-06 04:38:12
Message-ID: 1281069492.27584.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-rrreviewers 
On tis, 2010-07-27 at 16:33 -0700, David Fetter wrote:
> * Do we already have it? 
> 
>     Not really.  There are kludges to accomplish these things, but
>     they're available mostly in the sense that a general-purpose
>     language allows you to write code to do anything a Turing machine
>     can do.

I think this has been obsoleted by the xmlexists patch.

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: pgsql-hackersDate: 2010-08-06 06:15:54
Subject: pgsql-hackers@news.hub.org 21% OFF on Pfizer!
Previous:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-08-06 03:57:37
Subject: Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch

pgsql-rrreviewers by date

Next:From: Mike FowlerDate: 2010-08-06 08:04:15
Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2010-08-06 02:29:10
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Adding xpath_exists function

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2013 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group