Excerpts from Mike Fowler's message of mar jun 29 06:37:28 -0400 2010:
> After seeing some other posts in the last couple of days, I realised I
> hadn't documented the function in the SGML. I have now done so, and
> added a couple of tests with XML literals. Please find the patch
> attached. Now time to go correct the xmlexists patch too...
Hmm, is 0 a valid node number in a xmlNodeSet? If it is, searching for
the zeroth node would make the code call PG_RETURN_BOOL(0), no?
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-08-06 02:44:30|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5599: Vacuum fails due to index corruption issues|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-08-06 02:11:20|
|Subject: LockDatabaseObject vs. LockSharedObject|
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-08-06 04:38:12|
|Subject: Re: Review: Re: [PATCH] Re: [HACKERS] Adding xpath_exists function|
|Previous:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-08-05 18:42:54|
|Subject: CommitFest 2010-07 week three progress report|