| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: review: xml_is_well_formed |
| Date: | 2010-08-03 15:15:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1280848526.13031.6.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On lör, 2010-07-31 at 13:40 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Well-formedness should probably only allow XML documents.
>
> I think the point of this function is to determine whether a cast to
> xml will throw an error. The behavior should probably match exactly
> whatever test would be applied there.
Maybe there should be
xml_is_well_formed()
xml_is_well_formed_document()
xml_is_well_formed_content()
I agree that consistency with SQL/XML is desirable, but for someone
coming from the outside, the unqualified claim that 'foo' is well-formed
XML might sound suspicious.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Richard | 2010-08-03 15:27:54 | Too problems when using Postgresql8.3.7,Please help! |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-03 15:10:49 | Re: Develop item from TODO list |