From:
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To:
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc:
Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().
Date:
2010-07-09 18:17:36
Message-ID:
1278699456.29736.1039.camel@ebony (view raw or flat )
Thread:
2010-07-09 14:06:01 from rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org (Robert Haas)
2010-07-09 14:51:27 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-09 15:07:30 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-09 16:36:28 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-09 17:07:52 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-09 17:19:31 from Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
2010-07-09 15:09:43 from Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
2010-07-09 17:12:12 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-12 06:45:30 from KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
2010-07-09 15:09:50 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-09 16:51:48 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-09 17:21:54 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-09 17:28:26 from Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
2010-07-09 17:33:26 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
2010-07-09 17:44:26 from Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
2010-07-09 17:38:52 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-09 18:01:11 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-09 18:17:36 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-09 21:21:54 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-11 07:58:18 from Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
2010-07-11 15:44:55 from Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
2010-07-11 16:11:07 from Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Lists:
pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 14:01 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 13:21 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Except that it *is* a change in behavior: the first check will occur
> >> too soon.
>
> > Sooner matters why?
>
> Consider PREPARE followed only later by EXECUTE. Your proposal would
> make the PREPARE fail outright, when it currently does not.
Just to avoid wasted investigation: are you saying that is important
behaviour that is essential we retain in PostgreSQL, or will you hear
evidence that supporting that leads to a performance decrease elsewhere?
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
Responses
pgsql-hackers by date
Next :From: Kevin GrittnerDate: 2010-07-09 18:49:50Subject : Re: WIP patch for serializable transactions with predicate lockingPrevious :From : Joshua D. DrakeDate : 2010-07-09 18:03:54Subject : Re: FYI: Ubuntu 10.04 lucid strange segfault
pgsql-committers by date
Next :From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-07-09 21:11:48Subject : pgsql: Fix ruleutils' get_variable() to print something useful for Vars Previous :From : Tom LaneDate : 2010-07-09 18:01:11Subject : Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add a hook in ExecCheckRTPerms().
