On tis, 2010-07-06 at 18:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> At this point it seems clear to me that we've not adequately thought
> through the implications of having two python versions in one
> application namespace, and I'm not sure the Python people have either.
> I think we need to do something to block that from happening, at least
> until we have a plausible way to make it work.
How about this?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-07-07 21:14:06|
|Subject: Re: Why is vacuum_defer_cleanup_age PGC_USERSET?|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-07-07 20:44:10|
|Subject: Re: t_self as system column|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-07-07 21:31:52|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Add note that using PL/Python 2 and 3 in the same session will |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-07-07 15:13:21|
|Subject: pgsql: Adjust mbutils.c so it won't get broken by future pgindent runs.|