| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gibheer <gibheer(at)zero-knowledge(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: LLVM / clang |
| Date: | 2010-06-30 22:29:26 |
| Message-ID: | 1277936966.27966.42.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-06-30 at 20:10 +0200, Gibheer wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 15:49:40 -0400, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
> wrote:
> >
> > For the record, here is a patch that would address these issues.
> >
> > At the moment, I'm waiting to get my hands on the new version 2.7 of
> > clang to see if some of these issues have gone away.
> >
> > Considering that clang already helped us find one bug in the code, I
> > think it's worth trying to make this work.
>
> I tried your patch, but it is only working, when I set CLANG="yes". As
> I'm not really an expert in makefiles, my first thought was, that it
> should work, when I set CC="clang" or is it not possible to detect,
> which compiler is used?
I suspect you didn't run autoreconf.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-06-30 22:55:47 | Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-06-30 22:27:03 | Re: Check constraints on non-immutable keys |