| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Keepalive for max_standby_delay |
| Date: | 2010-06-30 19:08:16 |
| Message-ID: | 1277924896.4151.274.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 10:09 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > It will get done. It is not the very first thing on my to-do list.
>
> ??? What is then?
>
> If it's not the first thing on your priority list, with 9.0 getting
> later by the day, maybe we should leave it to Robert and Simon, who *do*
> seem to have it first on *their* list?
>
> I swear, when Simon was keeping his branch to himself in August everyone
> was on his case. It sure seems like Tom is doing exactly the same thing.
Hmmm, yes, looks that way. At that time I was actively working on the
code, not just locking it to prevent other activity.
The only urgency on my part here was to fulfil my responsibility to the
project.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-06-30 21:05:51 | Re: Keeping separate WAL segments for each database |
| Previous Message | Devrim GÜNDÜZ | 2010-06-30 18:54:06 | Keeping separate WAL segments for each database |