On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 21:56 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> Yes, I'll get with it ...
> > Any update on this?
> Sorry, I've been a bit distracted by other responsibilities (libtiff
> security issues for Red Hat, if you must know). I'll get on it shortly.
I don't think the PostgreSQL project should wait any longer on this. If
it does we risk loss of quality in final release, assuming no slippage.
>From here, I will rework my patch of 31 May to
* use arrival time on standby as base for max_standby_delay
* make delay apply to both streaming and file cases
* min_standby_grace_period - min grace on every query, default 0
Decision time, so thoughts please?
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2010-06-28 08:40:12|
|Subject: Re: beta3 & the open items list|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2010-06-28 05:03:23|
|Subject: Re: Why are these modules built without respecting my