Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: rename of a view

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rename of a view
Date: 2007-06-30 04:26:11
Message-ID: 12776.1183177571@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> writes:
> I didn't test your patch, but I think we could disallow ALTER TABLE to
> rename sequence and view

There is exactly 0 chance of that happening, because it's always worked
historically.

Personally I don't see a lot of value in this patch at all, but maybe
it is small enough to be justifiable.  I am not sure it is complete
however, in the sense of touching everyplace that should be touched,
especially documentation-wise?  I mean, its only excuse to live is
that "I expected to find this functionality under $foo", and so I'm
wondering how many values of $foo there are.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-06-30 05:33:05
Subject: Re: rename of a view
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2007-06-30 04:15:04
Subject: Re: rename of a view

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2007-06-30 05:33:05
Subject: Re: rename of a view
Previous:From: Euler Taveira de OliveiraDate: 2007-06-30 04:15:04
Subject: Re: rename of a view

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group