Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 release timetable

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 release timetable
Date: 2010-05-31 16:14:32
Message-ID: 1275322472.21465.184.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 11:10 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > We're currently at 4 weeks since last beta, with no new beta in sight.
> 
> Eh?
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-05/msg01649.php
> You can hardly claim to have not seen it.

Yes, completely wrong. A sunny weekend away wiped my mind. Hopefully
that doesn't detract from the other points I made.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavel StehuleDate: 2010-05-31 16:23:03
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-05-31 16:14:12
Subject: Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group