Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Londiste

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Londiste
Date: 2010-05-25 20:57:18
Message-ID: 1274821038.6203.2828.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:23 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

> > Can anyone suggest where a "Londiste" mention would fit in our high
> > availability docs?
> >
> > http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/high-availability.html
> 
> We already have Slony there as an "example of" async master-slave. Is 
> there some problem you are trying to fix? It would be hard to add this 
> without opening the floodgates of mentioning all replication systems.

Don't see a problem with mentioning Londiste.

It's not like there's that many production-strength candidates that we
shouldn't mention them all. Right now, I see it as the only missing one
on the list.



BTW Bruce, "log shipping" isn't mentioned at all in that section, which
is strange since that's what's in 9.0.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

  • Re: Londiste at 2010-05-25 15:23:23 from Greg Sabino Mullane

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-05-26 19:56:45
Subject: Re: Londiste
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-05-25 18:15:07
Subject: Re: Londiste

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group