Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Londiste

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Londiste
Date: 2010-05-25 20:57:18
Message-ID: 1274821038.6203.2828.camel@ebony (view raw or whole thread)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 15:23 +0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:

> > Can anyone suggest where a "Londiste" mention would fit in our high
> > availability docs?
> >
> >
> We already have Slony there as an "example of" async master-slave. Is 
> there some problem you are trying to fix? It would be hard to add this 
> without opening the floodgates of mentioning all replication systems.

Don't see a problem with mentioning Londiste.

It's not like there's that many production-strength candidates that we
shouldn't mention them all. Right now, I see it as the only missing one
on the list.

BTW Bruce, "log shipping" isn't mentioned at all in that section, which
is strange since that's what's in 9.0.

 Simon Riggs 

In response to

  • Re: Londiste at 2010-05-25 15:23:23 from Greg Sabino Mullane

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-05-26 19:56:45
Subject: Re: Londiste
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-05-25 18:15:07
Subject: Re: Londiste

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2015 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group