| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be |
| Date: | 2010-05-25 16:36:42 |
| Message-ID: | 1274805402.6203.2141.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:12 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> Hmm, OK, I think that makes sense. Would you care to propose a patch?
> >
> > Yep. Here is the patch.
> >
> > This patch distinguishes normal shutdown from unexpected exit, while the
> > server is in recovery. That is, when smart or fast shutdown is requested
> > during recovery, the bgwriter sets the ControlFile->state to new-introduced
> > DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY state.
>
> This patch is worth applying for 9.0? If not, I'll add it into
> the next CF for 9.1.
Presumably Robert will be applying the patch? It seems to address the
concern raised on the thread.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-25 16:38:07 | Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-25 16:32:35 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |