Re: pg_restore ignores -C when using a restore list -L

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Russell Smith <mr-russ(at)pws(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore ignores -C when using a restore list -L
Date: 2010-05-14 19:15:46
Message-ID: 1273864527-sup-5360@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010:

> However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious
> to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a
> de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the
> DATABASE item.
>
> I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l
> is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that
> -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments?

+1
--

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rumko 2010-05-14 20:08:41 Re: Giant TOAST tables due to many almost empty pages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-05-14 18:02:02 Re: Giant TOAST tables due to many almost empty pages