Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: snprintf improvements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: snprintf improvements
Date: 2005-03-02 19:18:40
Message-ID: 12735.1109791120@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> This patch uses our own snprintf() only when NLS support is enabled,

I see no point in this; it does not solve any problem we need solved,
only complicate the configuration behavior even more.

> I added support for %qd and %I64d in snprintf.

I consider this an awful idea as well.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2005-03-02 19:35:12
Subject: Re: snprintf improvements
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2005-03-02 18:29:01
Subject: Re: [BUGS] typos in the docu

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group