| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "rod(at)iol(dot)ie" <rod(at)iol(dot)ie>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Native DB replication for PG |
| Date: | 2010-04-30 20:46:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1272660400.2733.36.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 13:42 -0700, Gauthier, Dave wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Gauthier, Dave
> >> <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com> wrote:
> >>> I believe v9 will have native DB master/slave DB replication (correct if
> >>> wrong). If so, what's the best guess on when will v9 be released?
> >>
> >> If I had to plan server deployments for the next year (and I do) I'd
> >> be sticking with pg 8.3 and a proven replication engine. Next summer
> >
> >Surely you mean 8.4? :-)
No, I would buy the 8.3 argument as well. Depending on your conservative
level. 8.4 is fine and all but 8.3 is about as rock solid as it gets. It
is a great baseline at this point.
Joshua D. Drake
--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-30 20:48:54 | Re: Inheritance efficiency |
| Previous Message | Gauthier, Dave | 2010-04-30 20:42:30 | Re: Native DB replication for PG |