From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Date: | 2010-04-28 09:37:38 |
Message-ID: | 1272447458.4161.10020.camel@ebony |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 20:13 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 18:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> Huh? How is a filter as coarse as an oldest-running-XID filter going
> >> to prevent that? And aren't we initializing from trustworthy data in
> >> ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo, anyway?
> >>
> >> I still say it's useless.
>
> > Quite possibly. Your looking at other code outside of this patch. I'm
> > happy that you do so, but is it immediately related? I can have another
> > look when we finish this.
>
> Well, it's nearby anyway. I've committed the present patch (with a
> number of fixes). While I was looking at it I came across several
> things in the existing code that I think are either wrong or at least
> inadequately documented --- the above complaint is just the tip of the
> iceberg. I'm going to make another pass over it to see if I'm just
> missing things, and then report back.
Thank you for your input and changes.
You're welcome to share my iceberg.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-28 09:54:21 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-28 09:22:12 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Make CheckRequiredParameterValues() depend upon correct |