Re: planet "top posters" section

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: planet "top posters" section
Date: 2010-04-22 18:40:17
Message-ID: 1271961617.12586.5.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Thu, 2010-04-22 at 19:20 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:18, Robert Treat
> <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> wrote:
> > More importantly, there's a flaw in your query me thinks. OmniTI currently
> > shows having 9 posts in the team section, which also matches the breakdown of
> > my cohorts (4,3,2) in the top posters section, however I also have a blog post
> > on the 13th, so I'd think that we should have at least 10 posts on our "Team",
> > no? I'm guessing others might be off as well, I only noticed cause I knew I had
> > blogged recently.
>
> Uh, que? There may be more posts now, but I see:

Shouldn't that be, vad?

:P

Joshua D. Drake

--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2010-04-22 19:15:40 Re: planet "top posters" section
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-04-22 17:20:40 Re: planet "top posters" section