Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes
Date: 2010-03-22 16:47:37
Message-ID: 1269276457.8481.944.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 09:00 -0700, David Fetter wrote:

> > Yes, for most people touching != overlap. So it just looks like a
> > bug.
> 
> I don't know which people you've surveyed, but at least in my math
> classes, one point in common was sufficient for an overlap.  I'd be
> happy to write up something that makes this clear.

If you're happy to document it, good, thanks.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2010-03-22 17:25:15
Subject: Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-03-22 16:02:23
Subject: Re: Comments on Exclusion Constraints and related datatypes

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group