Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:33 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> So I think we need a parameter for join removal also.
> I had this in my original patch but Tom wanted it taken out.
And I still don't want it. We are NOT going in the direction of adding
an enable_ knob for every single planner activity --- do you have the
faintest idea how many there would be? We have such knobs for a small
number of cases where it's arguable that the action might be the wrong
thing for a particular query. Join removal, if applicable, can't
possibly be the wrong choice; it's better than every other join strategy.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2010-03-29 14:42:19|
|Subject: Re: enable_joinremoval|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-03-29 13:39:22|
|Subject: Re: five-key syscaches|