| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Lou Picciano <loupicciano(at)comcast(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? |
| Date: | 2010-03-05 11:48:53 |
| Message-ID: | 1267789733.15738.2.camel@fsopti579.F-Secure.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On tor, 2010-03-04 at 12:09 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I think that the whole idea of make targets building different things
> depending on what you've built previously is confusing,
> counterintuitive, and illogical. make all should either build the
> docs, or not; trying to guess what the user wants is, IMO, nuts.
The consequence of that would effectively be to make the SGML tools
mandatory for a CVS checkout.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-03-05 11:50:29 | Re: PostgreSQL-9.0alpha: jade required? |
| Previous Message | Markus Wichitill | 2010-03-05 10:24:24 | BUG #5364: citext behavior when type not in public schema |