Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <adunstan(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert
Date: 2010-02-26 18:37:19
Message-ID: 1267209439.20134.1231.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 13:25 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 21:32 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 00:06 +0000, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > > > > Log Message:
> > > > > -----------
> > > > > pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert the
> > > > > previous patch.
> > > >
> > > > I notice that the release notes talk about "parallel restore", yet the
> > > > word parallel is not used in the docs anywhere. The section on restoring
> > > > a dump makes no mention of this new facility,
> >
> > The doc patch you applied does nothing to address these points
>
> We don't usually modify past release notes.

Cool, but my comment has nothing to do with that. Please reread.

--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-27 01:39:46 pgsql: Document ATAPI drive flush command, and mention SSD drives.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-26 18:25:04 Re: pgsql: pg_restore -jN does not equate "multiple jobs", so partly revert