Re: knngist patch support

From: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, tomas(at)tuxteam(dot)de, "Ragi Y(dot) Burhum" <rburhum(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: knngist patch support
Date: 2010-02-14 00:12:44
Message-ID: 1266106364.29919.5916.camel@jdavis
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 13:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> If we didn't already have the plus/minus-for-WINDOW-RANGE example
> staring us in the face, I might think that an extensible solution
> wasn't needed here ... but we do so I think we really need to allow
> for multiple categories in some form.

Is this also an opportunity to provide the infrastructure to assign
meaning to operators?

Related discussion:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg01443.php

Regards,
Jeff Davis

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-14 00:25:48 Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl [PATCH]
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2010-02-14 00:00:25 Re: Package namespace and Safe init cleanup for plperl [PATCH]