On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 17:32 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > 
> > So it seems at least the behavior is quite different from what the
> > docs stats. Am I missing something here?
> Its a small bug/typo in standby.c:ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase
> 
> The line:
> 		CancelDBBackends(dbid, PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_TABLESPACE, true);
> 
> has to be
> 		CancelDBBackends(dbid, PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_DATABASE, true);

Well spotted, thanks for the report and the analysis.

The code for drop database worked when committed but it looks like the
re-factoring of the code broke it. Will fix.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

• Re: Hot Standby and DROP DATABASE at 2010-02-06 16:32:43 from Andres Freund

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2010-02-07 16:58:44
	Subject: Re: pg_class has no toast table?
Previous:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-02-07 16:44:38
	Subject: Re: Precedence of Postfix operators