On Sat, 2010-02-06 at 17:32 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> > So it seems at least the behavior is quite different from what the
> > docs stats. Am I missing something here?
> Its a small bug/typo in standby.c:ResolveRecoveryConflictWithDatabase
> The line:
> CancelDBBackends(dbid, PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_TABLESPACE, true);
> has to be
> CancelDBBackends(dbid, PROCSIG_RECOVERY_CONFLICT_DATABASE, true);
Well spotted, thanks for the report and the analysis.
The code for drop database worked when committed but it looks like the
re-factoring of the code broke it. Will fix.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-02-07 16:58:44|
|Subject: Re: pg_class has no toast table?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-02-07 16:44:38|
|Subject: Re: Precedence of Postfix operators |