Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-02-01 19:40:02
Message-ID: 1265053202.13782.12964.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:01 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:

> Putting it back takes time and
> given enough of that rare cloth, it will eventually be put back.

Looks like I'll have time to add the starts-at-shutdown-checkpoint item
back in after all.

I'd appreciate it if you could review the relation-specific conflict
patch, 'cos it's still important.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Nathan BoleyDate: 2010-02-01 20:01:28
Subject: Re: plpython3
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-02-01 19:29:17
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group