Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Date: 2010-01-30 09:33:43
Message-ID: 1264844023.20340.0.camel@vanquo.pezone.net (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On fre, 2010-01-29 at 16:06 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The way the docs stand now we hold it over people's heads and issue
> warnings that are meaningless if we are never going to change it. 

Maybe the next step should be to leave standard_conforming_strings off
but make the warning an error.


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Boszormenyi ZoltanDate: 2010-01-30 10:09:34
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG Re: out-of-scope cursor errors
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-30 07:07:46
Subject: Re: Pathological regexp match

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group