Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-01-29 19:44:28
Message-ID: 1264794268.1360.20.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:41 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
> 
> Is there a working list of HS must-fix items somewhere which people
> agree on?  Or are we still lacking consensus?

VACUUM FULL, I believe is one.

Joshua D. Drake

> 
> --Josh Berkus
> 


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-01-29 19:51:53
Subject: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2010-01-29 19:43:06
Subject: Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group