Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-01-29 18:14:19
Message-ID: 1264788859.1360.16.camel@jd-desktop.unknown.charter.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 18:08 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> > Two months on, there is
> > zero sign of any activity on that front
> 
> I'm surprised that you call 14 commits in 28 days following a publicly
> available priority list: "zero sign of activity".
> 
> Further discussion seems pointless.

Let's be clear. Robert is discussing release blockers. He is not
suggesting that no work has been done. I believe the community considers
release-blocks "the priority".

Joshua D. Drake


-- 
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-29 18:14:52
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-29 18:08:37
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group