Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Date: 2010-01-29 18:08:37
Message-ID: 1264788517.24669.18094.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:23 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Two months on, there is
> zero sign of any activity on that front

I'm surprised that you call 14 commits in 28 days following a publicly
available priority list: "zero sign of activity".

Further discussion seems pointless.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-01-29 18:14:19
Subject: Re: Hot Standby: Relation-specific deferred conflict resolution
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-29 17:55:05
Subject: Re: ordered aggregates using WITHIN GROUP (was Re: can somebody execute this query on Oracle 11.2g and send result?)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group