| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |
| Date: | 2010-01-28 17:45:56 |
| Message-ID: | 1264700756.24669.11167.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm keen to allow cascading in 9.0. If you pull both synch rep and
> > cascading you're not offering much that isn't already there.
>
> FWIW, I don't agree with that prioritization in the least. Cascading
> is something we could leave till 9.1, or even later, and
Not what you said just a few days ago.
> hardly anyone would care.
Unfortunately, I think you're very wrong on that specific point.
> We have much more important problems to be spending our
> effort on right now.
I'm a little worried the feature set of streaming rep isn't any better
than what we have already. If we're going to destabilise the code, we
really should be adding some features as well.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-28 17:49:20 | Re: plperl compiler warning |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-01-28 17:42:26 | Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery |