Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery
Date: 2010-01-28 17:45:56
Message-ID: 1264700756.24669.11167.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 11:41 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm keen to allow cascading in 9.0. If you pull both synch rep and
> > cascading you're not offering much that isn't already there.
> 
> FWIW, I don't agree with that prioritization in the least.  Cascading
> is something we could leave till 9.1, or even later, and 

Not what you said just a few days ago.

> hardly anyone would care.

Unfortunately, I think you're very wrong on that specific point.

>  We have much more important problems to be spending our
> effort on right now.

I'm a little worried the feature set of streaming rep isn't any better
than what we have already. If we're going to destabilise the code, we
really should be adding some features as well.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-28 17:49:20
Subject: Re: plperl compiler warning
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-01-28 17:42:26
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group