On tis, 2010-01-26 at 03:08 -0800, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2010, at 23:14, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> > why is concat_agg better than listagg ?
> Because it's an aggregate that cocatenates values. It's not an
> aggregate that lists things. I also like concat_agg better than
> string_agg because it's not limited to acting on strings.
What else can it act on?
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Michael Meskes||Date: 2010-01-26 12:12:05|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-01-26 11:54:30|
|Subject: Re: Dividing progress/debug information in pg_standby,
and stat before copy|