On Mon, 2010-01-25 at 10:03 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > The PostgreSQL project is changing the official name of
> > the project from "PostgreSQL" to "Postgres". Postgres has
> > been a recognized alias for many years, and is the preferred
> > usage by many in the community. The use of PostgreSQL will
> > still be used in many places, but over time will be replaced
> > by Postgres. Again, both names are acceptable, but Postgres
> > is the preferred usage.
> Nice attempt at a compromise. However, it ignores several points around
> a name change:
> (1) JPUG, our single largest user community representing at least 25% of
> PostgreSQL users worldwide, opposes a name change.
> (2) "Postgres" is really not that much better of a name. WTF does it
> mean? If we're renaming, how about "AdvancedDB"? "AllYouEverNeedDB"? Or
> "EnterpriseDB"? Oh, wait. ;-)
> (3) Our project continually suffers from insufficient volunteer effort
> for marketing to do simple nuts-and-bolts things with proven ability to
> improve adoption: website overhaul, case studies, howto guides, news
> articles, blogs. Where are we going to get the time to do the kind of
> marketing campaign a name change requires? "I have a regex" doesn't cut it.
> (4) When Neil said back before 8.0 that it was our last chance to change
> the name, he was right. And we determined we couldn't do it without
> holding up the release. I still stand by that decision.
> --Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.
In response to
pgsql-advocacy by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-01-25 19:30:01|
|Subject: Wanted: new project slogan|
|Previous:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2010-01-25 19:12:56|
|Subject: Re: Commission clears Oracle's proposed acquisition
of Sun Microsystems|