On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 17:33 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> Was there any discussion about this change? I don't recall seeing it
> proposed on hackers.

Unfortunately, you missed it. I posted the proposed patch, including the
text of the commit message that I was planning to use on Tuesday,
requesting reviews or commit by end of week.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

• Re: pgsql: In HS, Startup process sets SIGALRM when waiting for buffer pin. at 2010-01-23 17:33:31 from Greg Stark

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-01-23 20:43:40
	Subject: We've broken something in error recovery
Previous:	From: James William Pye	Date: 2010-01-23 20:28:18
	Subject: Re: plpython3

pgsql-committers by date

Next:	From: Tom Lane	Date: 2010-01-23 21:29:00
	Subject: pgsql: Insert CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS calls into loops in dbsize.c, to
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2010-01-23 20:28:00
	Subject: Re: pgsql: In HS, Startup process sets SIGALRM when waiting for buffer pin.