Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This is a larger change than I would prefer to back-patch, but the only
>> less-invasive alternative I can see is to lobotomize the PlaceHolderVar
>> mechanism entirely by reverting to 8.3-style logic wherein we prevented
>> pullup of sub-selects that would require introduction of placeholders.
>> That would undo a significant optimization feature of 8.4, one that
>> I believe we're now relying on for reasonable performance of some system
>> Thoughts, better ideas?
> Personally, I would rather back-patch a more invasive bug fix than a
> performance regression.
Yeah, me too. Attached is a draft patch against HEAD --- comments?
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Itagaki Takahiro||Date: 2010-09-28 02:05:07|
|Subject: Re: I: About "Our CLUSTER implementation is pessimal" patch|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-09-28 01:07:33|
|Subject: Re: security label support, revised|