On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 08:28 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>> It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a
> >> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
> >> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send
> >> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.
> > Is that something you're working on?
How accurate is this now? With regard to remaining items of work.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Takahiro Itagaki||Date: 2010-01-18 08:55:52|
|Subject: Re: Partitioning syntax|
|Previous:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-01-18 08:37:03|
|Subject: Re: Bloom index|