On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 08:28 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 22:57 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>> It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a
> >> timestamp on it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
> >>
> >> Yeah, that would help. In streaming replication we could also send
> >> such timestamp as a separate message, not within WAL.
> > 
> > Is that something you're working on?
> 
> No.

How accurate is this now? With regard to remaining items of work.
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Streaming_Replication

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

• Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay at 2010-01-18 06:28:13 from Heikki Linnakangas

Responses

• Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay at 2010-01-18 09:35:01 from Fujii Masao

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Takahiro Itagaki	Date: 2010-01-18 08:55:52
	Subject: Re: Partitioning syntax
Previous:	From: Greg Stark	Date: 2010-01-18 08:37:03
	Subject: Re: Bloom index