On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 11:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm wondering if it wouldn't just be easier to put in a plugin for
> > recovery conflict handling, so the user can decide what to do
> > themselves. That seems like a better plan than chewing through these
> > issues now. 
> 
> Making it a plugin doesn't solve anything.  This is not the kind of
> thing where people can come up with some random policy and it will
> work well.  Anyone competent to invent a better policy would be quite
> capable of modifying the source to suit themselves.

Agreed, with some regrets.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

• Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay at 2010-01-16 16:37:02 from Tom Lane

Responses

• Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay at 2010-01-16 20:12:37 from Joshua D. Drake

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-01-16 18:47:45
	Subject: Re: quoting psql varible as identifier
Previous:	From: Simon Riggs	Date: 2010-01-16 17:51:37
	Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay