On Sat, 2010-01-16 at 11:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm wondering if it wouldn't just be easier to put in a plugin for
> > recovery conflict handling, so the user can decide what to do
> > themselves. That seems like a better plan than chewing through these
> > issues now.
> Making it a plugin doesn't solve anything. This is not the kind of
> thing where people can come up with some random policy and it will
> work well. Anyone competent to invent a better policy would be quite
> capable of modifying the source to suit themselves.
Agreed, with some regrets.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-16 18:47:45|
|Subject: Re: quoting psql varible as identifier|
|Previous:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-01-16 17:51:37|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay|