On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 20:50 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> That would change the meaning of max_standby_delay. Currently, it's the
> delay between *generating* and applying a WAL record, your proposal
> would change it to mean delay between receiving and applying it. That
> seems a lot less useful to me.
It would be good if there was a keepalive WAL record with a timestamp on
it generated every N seconds while in streaming mode.
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Simon Riggs||Date: 2010-01-16 18:20:37|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby and handling max_standby_delay|
|Previous:||From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner||Date: 2010-01-16 17:22:57|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication status|