Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication, loose ends

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Date: 2010-01-15 23:12:59
Message-ID: 1263597179.26654.40947.camel@ebony (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 22:38 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 19:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > How about "Log Streaming Replication"?
> >
> > So its a particular kind of replication, which seems correct to me.
> 
> I thought the whole point of this effort was to be able to bill it as
> a built-in easy replication which was perceived as a major hole in
> Postgres's feature set.

How does that affect my proposal?

Heikki called it Streaming Replication; I have just added "Log" to it,
to make clear that it is similar in many ways to File-based Log
Shipping, which was a section heading earlier in docs.

-- 
 Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.com


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2010-01-15 23:28:25
Subject: Mammoth in Core?
Previous:From: Erik RijkersDate: 2010-01-15 23:12:47
Subject: Re: review: More frame options in window functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group