| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Streaming replication, loose ends |
| Date: | 2010-01-15 23:12:59 |
| Message-ID: | 1263597179.26654.40947.camel@ebony |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 22:38 +0000, Greg Stark wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 19:29 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > How about "Log Streaming Replication"?
> >
> > So its a particular kind of replication, which seems correct to me.
>
> I thought the whole point of this effort was to be able to bill it as
> a built-in easy replication which was perceived as a major hole in
> Postgres's feature set.
How does that affect my proposal?
Heikki called it Streaming Replication; I have just added "Log" to it,
to make clear that it is similar in many ways to File-based Log
Shipping, which was a section heading earlier in docs.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-01-15 23:28:25 | Mammoth in Core? |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-01-15 23:12:47 | Re: review: More frame options in window functions |