On ons, 2010-01-13 at 13:33 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> The only thing I am currently looking for is an objective review of the
> patch based on the benefits it provides.
Right, but I was opining that such a vague feature listing is not
adequate for that.
> I can tell you that if the Pye
> patch provides stack trace capability and the current PL does not. That
> right there is enough for me to push a +1 for review and possible
That is the case.
> If you feel what James is saying is actually trite and more buzzword
> compliant I welcome the opportunity to see a comparative of the current
> status of PL/Python versus the Pye patch from you. If nothing else it is
> a learning opportunity for all involved.
There was extensive discussion about some of the design decisions
upthread, so any reviewer should review those. It may end up being a
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-13 21:47:37|
|Subject: Re: primary key display in psql |
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-13 21:42:36|
|Subject: Re: patch to implement ECPG side tracing / tracking ... |