Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>,Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags & 0x01)",)
Date: 2005-10-31 18:00:35
Message-ID: 12634.1130781635@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> If you go for a new state code, rather than a separate
> boolean, does it reduce the size of the patch?

No, and it certainly wouldn't improve my level of confidence in it ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-31 18:01:14
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-31 17:56:45
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-31 18:01:14
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-10-31 17:56:45
Subject: Re: slru.c race condition (was Re: [HACKERS] TRAP: FailedAssertion("!((itemid)->lp_flags

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group