On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 12:52 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
> > Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> >> I agree. My main concern in terms of dealing with these outstanding
> >> is that it will distract us, particularly Tom, from stabilizing the
> >> tree, especially HS, VF, and SR. If the tree were in a releasable
> >> state today I wouldn't be worrying about it.
> > You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
> > instead.
> I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message
> with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big,
> outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree.
> Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I
> accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
Agreed. (although I think we should bump the big outstanding patches)
Joshua D. Drake
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
Respect is earned, not gained through arbitrary and repetitive use or Mr. or Sir.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Kevin Grittner||Date: 2010-01-12 17:58:16|
|Subject: Re: NOT NULL violation and error-message|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2010-01-12 17:52:20|
|Subject: Re: damage control mode|